[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231128123027.971610-2-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:30:26 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: hch@....de, ming.lei@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: move .bd_inode into 1st cacheline of block_device
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
The .bd_inode field of block_device is used in IO fast path of
blkdev_write_iter() and blkdev_llseek(), so it is more efficient to keep
it into the 1st cacheline.
.bd_openers is only touched in open()/close(), and .bd_size_lock is only
for updating bdev capacity, which is in slow path too.
So swap .bd_inode layout with .bd_openers & .bd_size_lock to move
.bd_inode into the 1st cache line.
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
include/linux/blk_types.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
index d5c5e59ddbd2..f7d40692dd94 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
@@ -49,9 +49,10 @@ struct block_device {
bool bd_write_holder;
bool bd_has_submit_bio;
dev_t bd_dev;
+ struct inode *bd_inode; /* will die */
+
atomic_t bd_openers;
spinlock_t bd_size_lock; /* for bd_inode->i_size updates */
- struct inode * bd_inode; /* will die */
void * bd_claiming;
void * bd_holder;
const struct blk_holder_ops *bd_holder_ops;
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists