[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231128021043.2099-1-angus.chen@jaguarmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:10:43 +0800
From: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Fix irqs_unhandled in note_interrupt
Commit 4f27c00bf80f ("Improve behaviour of spurious IRQ detect")
introduced a age of last_unhandled,after irq_count reached 100000,
we set irqs_unhandled = 0,but we didn't clear last_unhandled.
So we can see the print of irq_spurious_proc_show is not consistent.
Like below:
root@...ernel:~# cat /proc/irq/138/spurious
count 99998
unhandled 1
last_unhandled 1543930240 ms
root@...ernel:~# cat /proc/irq/138/spurious
count 0
unhandled 0
last_unhandled 1548915240 ms
we can set last_unhandled=1 as a prompting message.
Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index 02b2daf07441..e883df04bdf1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
mod_timer(&poll_spurious_irq_timer,
jiffies + POLL_SPURIOUS_IRQ_INTERVAL);
}
- desc->irqs_unhandled = 0;
+ desc->irqs_unhandled = 1;
}
bool noirqdebug __read_mostly;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists