linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DSIPHY RPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:53:12 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DSIPHY RPM

On 15.07.2023 17:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>>>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on SM6375.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
>>>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
>>> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
>>>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
>>
>> Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now.
>>
>> I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look?
> I see no reason why it would break things :/
> 
> You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all
> PDs should still be pinned at max vote..
> 
> Can we somehow retest it?
> 
> If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking
> up vddcx?
IIRC this was a fluke with the CI, can we retry?

Konrad