[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtA2g-rDPBJkoXpcHrz4vcYAivequkLvWUXgwQpqFcZkOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:57:08 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, lenb@...nel.org, robert.moore@...el.com,
lukasz.luba@....com, pierre.gondois@....com,
beata.michalska@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, suagrfillet@...il.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, lftan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] topology: Add a new arch_scale_freq_reference
Hi Ionela,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 17:00, Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 28 Nov 2023 at 15:52:52 (+0000), Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > I have a small request on this patch, which is useful for [1].
> > I'll detail what is needed lower in the code.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZWYDr6JJJzBvsqf0@arm.com/
> >
> > On Thursday 09 Nov 2023 at 11:14:32 (+0100), Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > @@ -279,13 +278,13 @@ void topology_normalize_cpu_scale(void)
> > >
> > > capacity_scale = 1;
> > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > > - capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(freq_factor, cpu);
> > > + capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu);
> >
> > The only affected code that I could find is here and below.
> >
> > The above line would have to change to:
> > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) ?: 1;
> >
> > > capacity_scale = max(capacity, capacity_scale);
> > > }
> > >
> > > pr_debug("cpu_capacity: capacity_scale=%llu\n", capacity_scale);
> > > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > > - capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(freq_factor, cpu);
> > > + capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu);
> >
> > and here:
> > capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) ?: 1;
> >
> > I think it's nicer to start with capacity_freq_ref as 0 and compensate here
> > for uninitialized capacity_freq_ref.
> >
> > Let me know if this is alright of if you'd prefer us to make this change
> > in a separate patch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ionela.
> >
>
> Correction - both will need to be:
> capacity = raw_capacity[cpu] * (per_cpu(capacity_freq_ref, cpu) ?: 1);
Yes, this one is better to keep the same behavior when cpufreq driver
is never loaded
I think this change should come as an additional patch either on top
of this series or directly as part of [1] which is the main user of
the change. I assume that's because you want arch_freq_get_on_cpu()
returns 0 until everything has been initialized
Vincent
>
> Thanks,
> Ionela.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists