[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEktqcv8NC0Cy+wo7nRGOp9USoBdta=n=mrbo-WomxgcmWN5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:13:44 +0100
From: Börge Strümpfel <boerge.struempfel@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bstruempfel@...ratronik.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: sysfs: Fix error handling on failed export
Hello Andy
Thanks again for your feedback.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:29 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:13:21PM +0100, Boerge Struempfel wrote:
> > If gpio_set_transitory() fails, we should free the gpio again. Most
>
> gpio --> GPIO descriptor
> (I already mentioned capitalization in v1 review)
>
I'm sorry, I misunderstood your comment "GPIO" in the v1 review. I fixed it for
the next version.
> > notably, the flag FLAG_REQUESTED has previously been set in
> > gpiod_request_commit(), and should be reset on failure.
> >
> > To my knowledge, this does not affect any current users, since the
> > gpio_set_transitory() mainly returns 0 and -ENOTSUPP, which is converted
> > to 0. However the gpio_set_transitory() function calles the .set_config()
> > function of the corresponding gpio chip and there are some gpio drivers in
>
> gpio --> GPIO
>
thanks
> > which some (unlikely) branches return other values like -EPROBE_DEFER,
> > and EINVAL. In these cases, the above mentioned FLAG_REQUESTED would not
>
> -EINVAL
>
thanks, I missed that, when I added the minus to all the other Error codes.
> > be reset, which results in the pin being blocked until the next reboot.
>
> Fixes tag?
> (`git log --no-merges --grep "Fixes:" will show you examples)
>
I thought it was optional. But I have added it for the next version.
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists