linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/radeon/r600_cs: Fix possible int overflows in r600_cs_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231129152230.7931-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:22:30 -0800
From:   Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
CC:     Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon/r600_cs: Fix possible int overflows in r600_cs_check_reg()

While improbable, there may be a chance of hitting integer
overflow when the result of radeon_get_ib_value() gets shifted
left.

Avoid it by casting one of the operands to larger data type (u64).

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static
analysis tool SVACE.

Fixes: 1729dd33d20b ("drm/radeon/kms: r600 CS parser fixes")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@...tech.ru>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
index 638f861af80f..6cf54a747749 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cs.c
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static int r600_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		tmp = (reg - CB_COLOR0_BASE) / 4;
-		track->cb_color_bo_offset[tmp] = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8;
+		track->cb_color_bo_offset[tmp] = (u64)radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8;
 		ib[idx] += (u32)((reloc->gpu_offset >> 8) & 0xffffffff);
 		track->cb_color_base_last[tmp] = ib[idx];
 		track->cb_color_bo[tmp] = reloc->robj;
@@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ static int r600_cs_check_reg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, u32 reg, u32 idx)
 					"0x%04X\n", reg);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		track->htile_offset = radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8;
+		track->htile_offset = (u64)radeon_get_ib_value(p, idx) << 8;
 		ib[idx] += (u32)((reloc->gpu_offset >> 8) & 0xffffffff);
 		track->htile_bo = reloc->robj;
 		track->db_dirty = true;
-- 
2.25.1