[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB4734BE1829B78CB772EDD299C783A@PH0PR18MB4734.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 04:42:15 +0000
From: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>,
Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@...vell.com>,
"egallen@...hat.com" <egallen@...hat.com>,
"mschmidt@...hat.com" <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"horms@...nel.org" <horms@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"wizhao@...hat.com" <wizhao@...hat.com>,
"konguyen@...hat.com" <konguyen@...hat.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/2] octeon_ep: implement device
unload control net API
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 3:25 AM
> To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
> >+ dev_info(&oct->pdev->dev, "Sending dev_unload msg to fw\n");
>
> Is it really necessary to print this at info level for each remove?
> Remove is a normal part of operation and we shouldn't spam logs
> unless we have a good reason..
I suppose it's not a need other than maybe for debug purposes. I'll use dev_dbg and submit a second version
Powered by blists - more mailing lists