[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWeNNMfqKquDYI9X@sunspire>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 21:12:52 +0200
From: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] iio: pressure: driver for Honeywell HSC/SSC series
hello!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:24:31PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:04:12PM +0200, Petre Rodan wrote:
> > Adds driver for digital Honeywell TruStability HSC and SSC series
> > pressure and temperature sensors.
> > Communication is one way. The sensor only requires 4 bytes worth of
> > clock pulses on both i2c and spi in order to push the data out.
> > The i2c address is hardcoded and depends on the part number.
> > There is no additional GPIO control.
>
> ...
>
> > v6: modifications based on Andy's review
> > - use str_has_prefix(), match_string() instead of strncmp()
>
> And why not using the respective property API for that case where
> match_string() is used?
I'm lost again.
437: ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "honeywell,pressure-triplet",
&triplet);
[..]
455: ret = match_string(hsc_triplet_variants, HSC_VARIANTS_MAX,
triplet);
if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
"honeywell,pressure-triplet is invalid\n");
hsc->pmin = hsc_range_config[ret].pmin;
hsc->pmax = hsc_range_config[ret].pmax;
triplet is got via device_property_read_string(), is there some other property
function I should be using?
> I'm also a bit tired to repeat about:
> - capitalization and punctuation in the multi-line comments;
> - broken indentation is some cases.
sorry about that. I removed all comments you complained about.
just to simplify the process.
> Otherwise it's a good stuff, I leave it now to Jonathan.
>
> ...
>
> > + tmp = div_s64(((s64)(hsc->pmax - hsc->pmin)) * MICRO,
> > + hsc->outmax - hsc->outmin);
> > + hsc->p_scale = div_s64_rem(tmp, NANO, &hsc->p_scale_dec);
> > + tmp = div_s64(((s64)hsc->pmin * (s64)(hsc->outmax - hsc->outmin)) *
> > + MICRO, hsc->pmax - hsc->pmin);
>
> Why not put MICRO on the previous line?
oh well, from the review I understood you were asking for the replacement of
NANO with MICRO on the previous instruction and it did not make much sense ( units
are in pascal and we need a kilopascal output to userland)
now I understood it's an indentation request. however moving MICRO will cross
the 80 column rule. but if there will be yet another modification request I'll move it.
cheers,
peter
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
--
petre rodan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists