[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231129202615.GN1312390@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:26:15 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity domain
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 07:29:43PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> @@ -2311,6 +2316,13 @@ static int device_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
> return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Hardware does not support the passthrough translation mode.
> + * Always use a dynamaic mapping domain.
> + */
> + if (!ecap_pass_through(iommu->ecap))
> + return IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
> +
Doesn't this return from def_domain_type completely prevent using an
identity domain?
I thought the point of this was to allow the identity domain but have
it be translating?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists