linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Pin control fixes for v6.7 minus one patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 22:43:43 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Pin control fixes for v6.7 minus one patch

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:48 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 07:18, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Here is an updated tag on a branch where the only change
> > is to drop the locking READ_ONCE() patch until we know
> > more about what is going on here.
>
> Bah. I already pulled the previous one and pushed out before reading
> more emails and noticing you had so quickly re-done it.
>
> So the READ_ONCE() workaround is there now, but I hope there will be a
> future patch that explains (and fixes) whatever made the value change
> from underneath that code.

Fair enough, we'll look closer at it. I just hope I get some help with
that from Maria.

Yours,
Linus Walleij