linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 18/24] i2c: designware: Consolidate PM ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:08:53 +0100
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/24] i2c: designware: Consolidate PM ops

Hi Andy,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:42:00PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have the same (*) PM ops in the PCI and plaform drivers.
> Instead, consolidate that PM ops under exported variable and
> deduplicate them.
> 
> *)
> With the subtle ACPI and P-Unit behaviour differences in PCI case.
> But this is not a problem as for ACPI we need to take care of the
> P-Unit semaphore anyway and calling PM ops for ACPI makes sense as
> it might provide specific operation regions in (however there are
> no known devices on market that are using it with PCI enabled I2C).
> Note, the clocks are not in use in the PCI case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>

The comment in the "prepare" function is a bit cryptic, though it
took me some time to disentangle from the double/triple negations :-)

Thanks,
Andi