[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0662715-928d-4685-8f88-f2129eddab3c@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 19:06:05 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
"gustavoars@...nel.org" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH][next] nouveau/gsp: replace zero-length array
with flex-array member and use __counted_by
On 11/28/23 19:01, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 11/16/23 20:55, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 20:45 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> As I already mentioned for Timur's patch [2], I'd prefer to get a fix
>>> upstream
>>> (meaning [1] in this case). Of course, that's probably more up to Timur to
>>> tell
>>> if this will work out.
>>
>> Don't count on it.
>
> I see. Well, I think it's fine. Once we implement a decent abstraction we likely
> don't need those header files in the kernel anymore.
>
> @Gustavo, if you agree I will discard the indentation change when applying the
> patch to keep the diff as small as possible.
No problem.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists