[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60dec3dd502baab260da06fe01453c5d@walle.cc>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:28:31 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Mario Kicherer <dev@...herer.org>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] spi: Unify error codes by replacing -ENOTSUPP with
-EOPNOTSUPP
> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
>
> This commit updates the SPI subsystem, particularly affecting "SPI MEM"
> drivers and core parts, by replacing the -ENOTSUPP error code with
> -EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> The key motivations for this change are as follows:
> 1. The spi-nor driver currently uses EOPNOTSUPP, whereas calls to
> spi-mem
> might return ENOTSUPP. This update aims to unify the error reporting
> within the SPI subsystem for clarity and consistency.
>
> 2. The use of ENOTSUPP has been flagged by checkpatch as inappropriate,
> mainly being reserved for NFS-related errors. To align with kernel
> coding
> standards and recommendations, this change is being made.
>
> 3. By using EOPNOTSUPP, we provide more specific context to the error,
> indicating that a particular operation is not supported. This helps
> differentiate from the more generic ENOTSUPP error, allowing drivers to
> better handle and respond to different error scenarios.
>
> Risks and Considerations:
> While this change is primarily intended as a code cleanup and error
> code
> unification, there is a minor risk of breaking user-space applications
> that rely on specific return codes for unsupported operations. However,
> this risk is considered low, as such use-cases are unlikely to be
> common
> or critical. Nevertheless, developers and users should be aware of this
> change, especially if they have scripts or tools that specifically
> handle
> SPI error codes.
>
> This commit does not introduce any functional changes to the SPI
> subsystem
> or the affected drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists