linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: pressure: add honeywell,hsc030

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:47:57 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: pressure: add honeywell,hsc030

On 29/11/2023 09:44, Petre Rodan wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:04:17AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/11/2023 08:04, Petre Rodan wrote:
>>> Adds binding for digital Honeywell TruStability HSC and SSC series
>>> pressure and temperature sensors.
>>> Communication is one way. The sensor only requires 4 bytes worth of
>>> clock pulses on both i2c and spi in order to push the data out.
>>> The i2c address is hardcoded and depends on the part number.
>>> There is no additional GPIO control.
>>
>> Your threading is broken (not existing) since v4, making it difficult to
>> apply the patchset. Please fix it when sending v6.
> 
> I'm confused.
> 
> you mean the lack of 'In-Reply-To' and 'References' headers in the emails
> `git send-email` is generating?
> I've added them for v2, but was told that was a mistake [1]
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231125191915.7f1f2dc4@jic23-huawei/
> 
> I'm probably misunderstanding something.
> also, I hope v5 is flawless enough.

No, v5 is still wrong. Patchset should be threaded. Open lore.kernel.org
and look how patchsets are organized and how your patchset is done.

It is as simple as:
git format-patch -v6 -2
scripts/get_maintainers.pl
git send-email v6*

(I combine the last two steps, so I don't even bother with
script/maintainers:
https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/.bash_aliases_linux#L91 )

But actually you should use b4, which also does this job correctly for you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof