lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0c0cbc0-776e-4587-bc1c-654a5154492c@foss.st.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:09:35 +0100
From:   Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
CC:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tee: Use iov_iter to better support shared buffer
 registration

Hi Sumit,


On 11/29/23 07:57, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
> 
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 13:49, Arnaud Pouliquen
> <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com> wrote:
>>
>> It is not possible to register buffers allocated with vmalloc.
> 
> I would rephrase it as:
> 
> Currently it's not possible to register kernel buffers with TEE
> which are allocated via vmalloc.
> 
>> Use iov_iter and associated helper functions to manage the page
>> registration for all type of memories.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Update from V2 to V3:
>> - break lines longer than 80 columns.
>>
>> Update from V1 to V2:
>> - replace ITER_SOURCE by ITER_DEST flag in tee_shm_register_user_buf(),
>> - replace IS_ERR_OR NULL(shm) by IS_ERR(shm) in tee_shm_register_user_buf().
>>
>> V1:
>> The support of buffer registration allocated with vmalloc is no more
>> available since c83900393aa1 ("tee: Remove vmalloc page support").
>>
>> This patch is an alternative to a revert and resulted from a discussion
>> with Christopher Hellwig [1].
>>
>> This patch has been tested using xtest tool in optee qemu environment [2]
>> and using the series related to the remoteproc tee that should be
>> proposed soon [3].
>>
>> References:
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/18a8528d-7d9d-6ed0-0045-5ee47dd39fb2@foss.st.com/T/#m8ec683c44fcd9b69c2aee42eaed0793afac9dd18in
>> [2] https://optee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/building/devices/qemu.html#build-instructions
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/18a8528d-7d9d-6ed0-0045-5ee47dd39fb2@foss.st.com/T/#maca0a1fc897aadd54c7deac432e11473fe970d1d
>> ---
>>  drivers/tee/tee_shm.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
>> index 673cf0359494..fe0a205be7ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_shm.c
>> @@ -22,23 +22,16 @@ static void shm_put_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count)
>>                 put_page(pages[n]);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int shm_get_kernel_pages(unsigned long start, size_t page_count,
>> -                               struct page **pages)
>> +static void shm_get_kernel_pages(struct page **pages, size_t page_count)
>>  {
>> -       struct page *page;
>>         size_t n;
>>
>> -       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(is_vmalloc_addr((void *)start) ||
>> -                        is_kmap_addr((void *)start)))
>> -               return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> -       page = virt_to_page((void *)start);
>> -       for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++) {
>> -               pages[n] = page + n;
>> +       /*
>> +        * iov_iter_extract_kvec_pages does not get reference on the pages,
>> +        * get a pin on them.
>> +        */
>> +       for (n = 0; n < page_count; n++)
>>                 get_page(pages[n]);
>> -       }
>> -
>> -       return page_count;
>>  }
>>
>>  static void release_registered_pages(struct tee_shm *shm)
>> @@ -214,13 +207,13 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_alloc_priv_buf(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t size)
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_alloc_priv_buf);
>>
>>  static struct tee_shm *
>> -register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr,
>> -                   size_t length, u32 flags, int id)
>> +register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, struct iov_iter *iter, u32 flags,
>> +                   int id)
>>  {
>>         struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev;
>>         struct tee_shm *shm;
>> -       unsigned long start;
>> -       size_t num_pages;
>> +       unsigned long start, addr;
>> +       size_t num_pages, length, len, off;
>>         void *ret;
>>         int rc;
>>
>> @@ -245,31 +238,32 @@ register_shm_helper(struct tee_context *ctx, unsigned long addr,
>>         shm->flags = flags;
>>         shm->ctx = ctx;
>>         shm->id = id;
>> -       addr = untagged_addr(addr);
>> +       addr = (unsigned long)iter_iov_addr(iter);
> 
> Why did you drop untagged_addr() here?

Right, better too keep it

> 
>> +       length = iter_iov_len(iter);
>>         start = rounddown(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
>> -       shm->offset = addr - start;
>> -       shm->size = length;
>> -       num_pages = (roundup(addr + length, PAGE_SIZE) - start) / PAGE_SIZE;
>> +       num_pages = iov_iter_npages(iter, INT_MAX);
>> +       if (!num_pages) {
>> +               ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +               goto err_ctx_put;
>> +       }
>> +
>>         shm->pages = kcalloc(num_pages, sizeof(*shm->pages), GFP_KERNEL);
>>         if (!shm->pages) {
>>                 ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>                 goto err_free_shm;
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (flags & TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED)
>> -               rc = pin_user_pages_fast(start, num_pages, FOLL_WRITE,
>> -                                        shm->pages);
>> -       else
>> -               rc = shm_get_kernel_pages(start, num_pages, shm->pages);
>> -       if (rc > 0)
>> -               shm->num_pages = rc;
>> -       if (rc != num_pages) {
>> -               if (rc >= 0)
>> -                       rc = -ENOMEM;
>> -               ret = ERR_PTR(rc);
>> +       len = iov_iter_extract_pages(iter, &shm->pages, LONG_MAX, num_pages, 0,
>> +                                    &off);
>> +       if (len != length) {
> 
> Any particular reason for this check?

Cross-checking to answer to your comment, I just released that
iov_iter_extract_pages returns ssize_t not size_t.
Therefore, I need to change the type of len and replace the check with
(len <= 0).

> 
>> +               ret = len ? ERR_PTR(len) : ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>                 goto err_put_shm_pages;
>>         }
>>
>> +       shm->offset = off;
>> +       shm->size = len;
>> +       shm->num_pages = num_pages;
>> +
>>         rc = teedev->desc->ops->shm_register(ctx, shm, shm->pages,
>>                                              shm->num_pages, start);
>>         if (rc) {
>> @@ -307,6 +301,8 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_user_buf(struct tee_context *ctx,
>>         u32 flags = TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED | TEE_SHM_DYNAMIC;
>>         struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev;
>>         struct tee_shm *shm;
>> +       struct iovec iov;
>> +       struct iov_iter iter;
>>         void *ret;
>>         int id;
>>
>> @@ -319,7 +315,10 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_user_buf(struct tee_context *ctx,
>>         if (id < 0)
>>                 return ERR_PTR(id);
>>
>> -       shm = register_shm_helper(ctx, addr, length, flags, id);
>> +       iov.iov_base = (void __user *)addr;
>> +       iov.iov_len = length;
>> +       iov_iter_init(&iter, ITER_DEST, &iov, 1, length);
> 
> We should rather use import_ubuf() instead of this and the above
> access_ok() check.

Thanks for the advice, I will test it.

> 
>> +       shm = register_shm_helper(ctx, &iter, flags, id);
>>         if (IS_ERR(shm)) {
>>                 mutex_lock(&teedev->mutex);
>>                 idr_remove(&teedev->idr, id);
>> @@ -351,9 +350,19 @@ struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_user_buf(struct tee_context *ctx,
>>  struct tee_shm *tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(struct tee_context *ctx,
>>                                             void *addr, size_t length)
>>  {
>> +       struct tee_shm *shm;
>>         u32 flags = TEE_SHM_DYNAMIC;
>> +       struct kvec kvec;
>> +       struct iov_iter iter;
>>
>> -       return register_shm_helper(ctx, (unsigned long)addr, length, flags, -1);
>> +       kvec.iov_base = addr;
>> +       kvec.iov_len = length;
>> +       iov_iter_kvec(&iter, ITER_DEST, &kvec, 1, length);
>> +       shm = register_shm_helper(ctx, &iter, flags, -1);
>> +       if (!IS_ERR(shm))
>> +               shm_get_kernel_pages(shm->pages, shm->num_pages);
> 
> The kernel pages reference should be taken before invoking
> teedev->desc->ops->shm_register(). So you should move this to
> register_shm_helper() instead. You can use iov_iter_is_kvec() to know
> if you have to get a reference or not.

Yes much better

Thanks!
Arnaud

> 
> -Sumit
> 
>> +
>> +       return shm;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_shm_register_kernel_buf);
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ