linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 07/23] PM: EM: Refactor how the EM table is allocated and populated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231129110853.94344-8-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:08:37 +0000
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     lukasz.luba@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        qyousef@...alina.io, wvw@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/23] PM: EM: Refactor how the EM table is allocated and populated

Split the process of allocation and data initialization for the EM table.
The upcoming changes for modifiable EM will use it.

This change is not expected to alter the general functionality.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
---
 kernel/power/energy_model.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 3c8542443dd4..99426b5eedb6 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -142,18 +142,25 @@ static int em_compute_costs(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int em_allocate_perf_table(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				  int nr_states)
+{
+	pd->table = kcalloc(nr_states, sizeof(struct em_perf_state),
+			    GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pd->table)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
+				struct em_perf_state *table,
 				int nr_states, struct em_data_callback *cb,
 				unsigned long flags)
 {
 	unsigned long power, freq, prev_freq = 0;
-	struct em_perf_state *table;
 	int i, ret;
 
-	table = kcalloc(nr_states, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!table)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	/* Build the list of performance states for this performance domain */
 	for (i = 0, freq = 0; i < nr_states; i++, freq++) {
 		/*
@@ -165,7 +172,7 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "EM: invalid perf. state: %d\n",
 				ret);
-			goto free_ps_table;
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -175,7 +182,7 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 		if (freq <= prev_freq) {
 			dev_err(dev, "EM: non-increasing freq: %lu\n",
 				freq);
-			goto free_ps_table;
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
 		/*
@@ -185,7 +192,7 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 		if (!power || power > EM_MAX_POWER) {
 			dev_err(dev, "EM: invalid power: %lu\n",
 				power);
-			goto free_ps_table;
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
 		table[i].power = power;
@@ -194,16 +201,9 @@ static int em_create_perf_table(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_domain *pd,
 
 	ret = em_compute_costs(dev, table, cb, nr_states, flags);
 	if (ret)
-		goto free_ps_table;
-
-	pd->table = table;
-	pd->nr_perf_states = nr_states;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
-
-free_ps_table:
-	kfree(table);
-	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
@@ -234,11 +234,15 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	ret = em_create_perf_table(dev, pd, nr_states, cb, flags);
-	if (ret) {
-		kfree(pd);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	pd->nr_perf_states = nr_states;
+
+	ret = em_allocate_perf_table(pd, nr_states);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_pd;
+
+	ret = em_create_perf_table(dev, pd, pd->table, nr_states, cb, flags);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_pd_table;
 
 	if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
 		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
@@ -249,6 +253,12 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
 	dev->em_pd = pd;
 
 	return 0;
+
+free_pd_table:
+	kfree(pd->table);
+free_pd:
+	kfree(pd);
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.25.1