[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWcdh1JNaPPnz36a@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 12:16:23 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: dt-bindings: add DTS Coding Style document
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/11/2023 08:29, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> ---
> >> +Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
> >> +
> >> +1. compatible
> >> +2. reg
> >> +3. ranges
> >> +4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without
> >> + vendor-prefixes)
...
> > On point 4, do you have a more explicit way to define what is an actual
> > standard/common property? You mention the vendor-prefixes as an example,
> > is this just an example or this is the whole definition?
>
> The actual definition is: defined by common bindings, which are:
> meta-schemas and schemas in dtschema, and common bindings per subsystem
> (e.g. leds/common.yaml).
>
> Lack of vendor-prefix is I think 99% accurate in this matter, but there
> are some "linux," ones.
Got it, thanks! I would suggest to incorporate in some way this additional
explanation in v4.
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists