linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:17:08 +0530
From:   Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <a39.skl@...il.com>,
        <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, <mani@...nel.org>,
        <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>, <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <vladimir.oltean@....com>, <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <qipl.kernel.upstream@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom
 prefetcher settings



On 11/27/2023 9:03 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 27.11.2023 15:54, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
>> Currently in Qualcomm  SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
>> the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
>> register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
>> to have a prefetch setting of 1/3/7/15 enabling TLB to prefetch
>> the next set of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
>>
>> ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
>> in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
>> context bank initialisation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@...cinc.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h |  6 ++-
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c      |  5 +-
>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h      |  5 ++
>>   4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 7f52ac67495f..4a38cae29be2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
>>
>>   #define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL	-1
>>
>> +struct actlr_config {
>> +	u16 sid;
>> +	u16 mask;
>> +	u32 actlr;
>> +};
>> +
>>   static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>   {
>>   	return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
>> @@ -205,10 +211,40 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>   	return true;
>>   }
>>
>> +static void arm_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
>> +		const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg, size_t actlrcfg_size)
>> +{
>> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>> +	struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> +	struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
>> +	int i;
>> +	int j;
>> +	u16 id;
>> +	u16 mask;
>> +	int idx;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < actlrcfg_size; ++i) {
>> +		id = (actlrcfg + i)->sid;
>> +		mask = (actlrcfg + i)->mask;
> actrlcfg[i].id?
> 

Noted, array indexing instead of incrementing the base address
should also work.

>> +
>> +		for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, j, idx) {
>> +			smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
>> +			if (smr_is_subset(*smr, id, mask))
> Any reason for this value to be a pointer?
> 
>> +				arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
>> +						(actlrcfg + i)->actlr);
> ditto
> 

Noted

>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>   		struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>   	struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
>> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> +	struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>> +	const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
>> +	size_t actlrcfg_size;
>> +	int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
> Reverse-Christmas-tree sorting, please
> 

Noted, thanks for pointing this, I will
take care of this in next revision.

>>
>>   	smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
>>
>> @@ -238,6 +274,12 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>   	priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>>   	priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>>
>> +	if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx) {
>> +		actlrcfg = qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx;
>> +		actlrcfg_size = qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_gfx_size;
> These can be passed directly s arm_smmu_set_actrl arguments
> 

Noted, will address in next revision. since there won't be any issue 
during time of access, I can pass these values directly.

>> +		arm_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrcfg, actlrcfg_size);
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -263,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
>>   static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>   		struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
>>   {
>> +	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> +	struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
>> +	const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg;
>> +	size_t actlrcfg_size;
>> +	int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
>> +
>> +	if (qsmmu->data->actlrcfg) {
>> +		actlrcfg = qsmmu->data->actlrcfg;
>> +		actlrcfg_size = qsmmu->data->actlrcfg_size;
>> +		arm_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrcfg, actlrcfg_size);
> ditto
>
Noted.

> Konrad