linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net/smc: Rename some variable 'fce' to 'fce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <298442c7-40f0-42ab-b5cb-07603d8689f5@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 13:50:08 +0100
From:   Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, wintera@...ux.ibm.com,
        hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
        raspl@...ux.ibm.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net/smc: Rename some variable 'fce' to
 'fce_v2x' for clarity



On 24.11.23 15:42, Wen Gu wrote:
> Rename some smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x type variables to 'fce_v2x'
> to distinguish them from smc_clc_first_contact_ext type variables.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   net/smc/smc_clc.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> index 0fda515..c41a249 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
> @@ -418,15 +418,15 @@ static bool smc_clc_msg_prop_valid(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> -static int smc_clc_fill_fce(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce,
> +static int smc_clc_fill_fce(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce_v2x,
>   			    struct smc_init_info *ini)

Since this function is only used by v2.x, IMO, this function name could 
also be changed to e.g. smc_clc_fill_fce_v2x.
>   {
> -	int ret = sizeof(*fce);
> +	int ret = sizeof(*fce_v2x);
>   
> -	memset(fce, 0, sizeof(*fce));
> -	fce->fce_v2_base.os_type = SMC_CLC_OS_LINUX;
> -	fce->fce_v2_base.release = ini->release_nr;
> -	memcpy(fce->fce_v2_base.hostname, smc_hostname, sizeof(smc_hostname));
> +	memset(fce_v2x, 0, sizeof(*fce_v2x));
> +	fce_v2x->fce_v2_base.os_type = SMC_CLC_OS_LINUX;
> +	fce_v2x->fce_v2_base.release = ini->release_nr;
> +	memcpy(fce_v2x->fce_v2_base.hostname, smc_hostname, sizeof(smc_hostname));
>   	if (ini->is_smcd && ini->release_nr < SMC_RELEASE_1) {
>   		ret = sizeof(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext);
>   		goto out;
> @@ -434,8 +434,8 @@ static int smc_clc_fill_fce(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x *fce,
>   
>   	if (ini->release_nr >= SMC_RELEASE_1) {
>   		if (!ini->is_smcd) {
> -			fce->max_conns = ini->max_conns;
> -			fce->max_links = ini->max_links;
> +			fce_v2x->max_conns = ini->max_conns;
> +			fce_v2x->max_links = ini->max_links;
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1003,8 +1003,8 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
>   				       int first_contact, u8 version,
>   				       u8 *eid, struct smc_init_info *ini)
>   {
> +	struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x fce_v2x;
>   	struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
> -	struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext_v2x fce;
>   	struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *clc;
>   	struct smc_clc_fce_gid_ext gle;
>   	struct smc_clc_msg_trail trl;
> @@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
>   				memcpy(clc_v2->d1.eid, eid, SMC_MAX_EID_LEN);
>   			len = SMCD_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN_V2;
>   			if (first_contact) {
> -				fce_len = smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, ini);
> +				fce_len = smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce_v2x, ini);
>   				len += fce_len;
>   			}
>   			clc_v2->hdr.length = htons(len);
> @@ -1083,9 +1083,9 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
>   				memcpy(clc_v2->r1.eid, eid, SMC_MAX_EID_LEN);
>   			len = SMCR_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN_V2;
>   			if (first_contact) {
> -				fce_len = smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, ini);
> +				fce_len = smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce_v2x, ini);
>   				len += fce_len;
> -				fce.fce_v2_base.v2_direct = !link->lgr->uses_gateway;
> +				fce_v2x.fce_v2_base.v2_direct = !link->lgr->uses_gateway;
>   				if (clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM) {
>   					memset(&gle, 0, sizeof(gle));
>   					gle.gid_cnt = ini->smcrv2.gidlist.len;
> @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
>   						SMCR_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN) -
>   				   sizeof(trl);
>   	if (version > SMC_V1 && first_contact) {
> -		vec[i].iov_base = &fce;
> +		vec[i].iov_base = &fce_v2x;
>   		vec[i++].iov_len = fce_len;
>   		if (!conn->lgr->is_smcd) {
>   			if (clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM) {