lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231129132527.8078-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 20:25:26 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@...il.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: livepatch: Correct "step on each other's toes" idiom

The idiom is written as "step over" instead, which means walking over
something [1]; although it should have meant getting involved (interfere)
in each other redirection method's effect [2], as implied in the
surrounding context.

Correct the idiom.

Link: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/step+over [1]
Link: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/step-on-toes [2]
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
---
I choose to keep the singular version of 'each other' since it refers to
individual redirection method (see [3] for grammatical explanation of why
it is the case ).

[3]: https://jakubmarian.com/each-others-vs-each-others-in-english/

 Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
index 68e3651e8af925..000059b3cbde49 100644
--- a/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ and livepatching:
     are in any way modified.
 
 All three approaches need to modify the existing code at runtime. Therefore
-they need to be aware of each other and not step over each other's toes.
+they need to be aware of each other and not step on each other's toes.
 Most of these problems are solved by using the dynamic ftrace framework as
 a base. A Kprobe is registered as a ftrace handler when the function entry
 is probed, see CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE. Also an alternative function from
-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ