[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac7a90a7-4d29-059b-fbff-6b67e6f5c2d3@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 08:53:22 -0500
From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs
On 11/29/23 08:25, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> I was prompted to write this little grammar fix series when reading
> the fix from Attreyee [1], with review comments requesting changes
> to that fix. So here's my version of the fix, with reviews from [1]
> addressed (and distinct grammar fixes splitted).
>
Typical kernel workflow would be for Attreyee to incorporate feedback
and post their v2 after a day or two. From the format they posted, it
appears to be a first(ish) kernel contribution post. Let's be kind and
patient so they we all may benefit from the practice of iterating on
their patch.
--
Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists