[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-WLUQcyMAWd_R4PKRcciRh=faNnixv38abWmj7V=To9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 23:09:54 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
To: syzbot <syzbot+listb51f932ee38ecac1b05d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sj1557.seo@...sung.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] Monthly exfat report (Nov 2023)
2023-11-28 6:03 GMT+09:00, syzbot
<syzbot+listb51f932ee38ecac1b05d@...kaller.appspotmail.com>:
> Hello exfat maintainers/developers,
Hi,
>
> This is a 31-day syzbot report for the exfat subsystem.
> All related reports/information can be found at:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream/s/exfat
>
> During the period, 1 new issues were detected and 0 were fixed.
> In total, 7 issues are still open and 12 have been fixed so far.
>
> Some of the still happening issues:
>
> Ref Crashes Repro Title
> <1> 225 No INFO: task hung in path_openat (7)
There is no reproducer and I couldn't find where it is connected to exfat.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=950a0cdaa2fdd14f5bdc
> <2> 150 No INFO: task hung in exfat_sync_fs
There is no reproducer... Let me know how to reproduce it.
This can happen when disk speed is very low and a lot of writes occur.
Is that so?
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=205c2644abdff9d3f9fc
> <3> 119 Yes WARNING in drop_nlink (2)
I'm curious how this issue was classified as an exfat issue.
When looking at the backtrace, this issue appears to be an hfsplus issue.
hfsplus_unlink+0x3fe/0x790 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:381
hfsplus_rename+0xc8/0x1c0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:547
vfs_rename+0xaba/0xde0 fs/namei.c:4844
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=651ca866e5e2b4b5095b
> <4> 38 Yes INFO: task hung in exfat_write_inode
I could not reproduce this by using C reproducer provided by you.
Can you confirm that this really cannot be reproduced using it?
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2f73ed585f115e98aee8
> <5> 1 No UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in exfat_fill_super (2)
This is false alarm. ->sect_size_bits could not be greater than 12 by
the check below.
/*
* sect_size_bits could be at least 9 and at most 12.
*/
if (p_boot->sect_size_bits < EXFAT_MIN_SECT_SIZE_BITS ||
p_boot->sect_size_bits > EXFAT_MAX_SECT_SIZE_BITS) {
exfat_err(sb, "bogus sector size bits : %u",
p_boot->sect_size_bits);
return -EINVAL;
}
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d33808a177641a02213e
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> To disable reminders for individual bugs, reply with the following command:
> #syz set <Ref> no-reminders
>
> To change bug's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set <Ref> subsystems: new-subsystem
>
> You may send multiple commands in a single email message.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists