[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFv23Qk6Qpxu+ROou5Uzdwu_0jSF-EYZPHynUps_5GOAakuJvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:27:40 +0800
From: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Kamal Dasu <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Mario Kicherer <dev@...herer.org>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Stop reporting warning message when
soft reset is not suported
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 於 2023年11月30日 週四 上午5:19寫道:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:46:02AM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
> > You haven't specified who shall take these patches. Is it fine for you
> > if I take just the SPI NOR bits? If you want Mark to queue both:
>
> I can certainly take both. I guess there's no build time dependency so
> we could each take the subsystem specific patch, though there'd be some
> bisection drift if that happens?
Hi Mark,
It'd be better if you could take both of them.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists