[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231130165131.00001abe@Huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:51:31 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>, <justin.he@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] drivers: base: add arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable()
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:44:36 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> The differences between architecture specific implementations of
> arch_register_cpu() are down to whether the CPU is hotpluggable or not.
> Rather than overriding the weak version of arch_register_cpu(), provide
> a function that can be used to provide this detail instead.
>
> Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists