[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfoJ+NFNFand8K7DVZP3Qdz=kp5+XBG_aAJ7-Twq8wvZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:43:13 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] pinctrl: sppctl: use gpiochip_dup_line_label()
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:46:28PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Use the new gpiochip_dup_line_label() helper to safely retrieve the
> > descriptor label.
>
> ...
>
> > for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
> > - label = gpiochip_is_requested(chip, i);
> > - if (!label)
> > - label = "";
> > + char *label __free(kfree) = gpiochip_dup_line_label(chip, i);
> > + if (IS_ERR(label))
> > + continue;
> >
> > seq_printf(s, " gpio-%03d (%-16.16s | %-16.16s)", i + chip->base,
> > - chip->names[i], label);
> > + chip->names[i], label ?: "");
>
> So, as it's non-ABI change, we still can use "reserved" word here as well
> ("Unrequested" or whatever.)
>
See my other comment regarding the changes in output.
Bart
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists