| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 06:04:38 +0000
From: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>
To: "Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>,
"Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V11 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the
highest perf has changed
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 2:55 PM
> To: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Huang, Ray
> <Ray.Huang@....com>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org;
> linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>; linux-
> kselftest@...r.kernel.org; Fontenot, Nathan <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>;
> Sharma, Deepak <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Huang, Shimmer
> <Shimmer.Huang@....com>; Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@....com>; Du,
> Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>;
> Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; Oleksandr Natalenko
> <oleksandr@...alenko.name>; Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@....com>
> Subject: [PATCH V11 4/7] cpufreq: Add a notification message that the
> highest perf has changed
>
> ACPI 6.5 section 8.4.6.1.1.1 specifies that Notify event 0x85 can be emmitted
> to cause the the OSPM to re-evaluate the highest performance register. Add
> support for this event.
>
> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Meng Li <li.meng@....com>
> Link:
> https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.ht
> ml#processor-device-notification-values
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> index 4bd16b3f0781..29b2fb68a35d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_PERFORMANCE 0x80
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_POWER 0x81
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_THROTTLING 0x82
> +#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_HIGEST_PERF_CHANGED 0x85
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Diefenbaugh");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Processor Driver"); @@ -83,6 +84,11 @@
> static void acpi_processor_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(device->pnp.device_class,
> dev_name(&device->dev),
> event, 0);
> break;
> + case ACPI_PROCESSOR_NOTIFY_HIGEST_PERF_CHANGED:
> + cpufreq_update_highest_perf(pr->id);
> + acpi_bus_generate_netlink_event(device->pnp.device_class,
> + dev_name(&device->dev),
> event, 0);
> + break;
> default:
> acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n",
> event);
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index
> 934d35f570b7..14a4cbc6dd05 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2717,6 +2717,19 @@ void cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu) }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_update_limits);
>
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_update_highest_perf - Update highest performance for a given
> CPU.
> + * @cpu: CPU to update the highest performance for.
> + *
> + * Invoke the driver's ->update_highest_perf callback if present */
> +void cpufreq_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) {
> + if (cpufreq_driver->update_highest_perf)
> + cpufreq_driver->update_highest_perf(cpu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_update_highest_perf);
> +
>
> /******************************************************************
> ***
> * BOOST *
>
> *******************************************************************
> **/
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index
> 1c5ca92a0555..f62257b2a42f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int cpu); void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy
> *policy); void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu); void
> cpufreq_update_limits(unsigned int cpu);
> +void cpufreq_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu);
> bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
> bool cpufreq_supports_freq_invariance(void);
> struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> @@ -263,6 +264,7 @@ static inline bool
> cpufreq_supports_freq_invariance(void)
> return false;
> }
> static inline void disable_cpufreq(void) { }
> +static inline void cpufreq_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) { }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
> @@ -380,6 +382,9 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> /* Called to update policy limits on firmware notifications. */
> void (*update_limits)(unsigned int cpu);
>
> + /* Called to update highest performance on firmware notifications. */
> + void (*update_highest_perf)(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> /* optional */
> int (*bios_limit)(int cpu, unsigned int *limit);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists