linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: cros-ec: Allow interrupts-extended property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:52:50 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: cros-ec: Allow interrupts-extended
 property

On 30/11/2023 09:33, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> "interrupts-extended" provides a more concise way of describing external
> GPIO interrupts.
> 
> Allow using this instead of "interrupts" plus "interrupt-parent" for
> cros-ec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml          | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> index e1ca4f297c6d..e514eac9f4fc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml
> @@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ properties:
>    interrupts:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  interrupts-extended:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +

I don't understand why you need it. You already have interrupts there,
so this is redundant. I suggest to drop the patch or provide real
rationale (which I doubt you can get :) ).

Best regards,
Krzysztof