[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e841d2f4-b221-9099-8312-6b859ccb98de@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:00:52 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Catherine Sullivan <csully@...gle.com>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] mm: Make the page_frag_cache allocator
alignment param a pow-of-2
On 2023/5/27 23:54, Alexander H Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 16:33 +0100, David Howells wrote:
>> Make the page_frag_cache allocator's alignment parameter a power of 2
>> rather than a mask and give a warning if it isn't.
>>
>> This means that it's consistent with {napi,netdec}_alloc_frag_align() and
>> allows __{napi,netdev}_alloc_frag_align() to be removed.
I am trying to rmove the page frag implemetation in
vhost_net_page_frag_refill() by using page_frag_alloc_align(), and
I ended up having a simiar patch as this one.
>>
>
> This goes against the original intention of these functions. One of the
> reasons why this is being used is because when somebody enables
> something like 2K jumbo frames they don't necessarily want to have to
> allocate 4K SLABs. Instead they can just add a bit of overhead and get
> almost twice the utilization out of an order 3 page.
>
> The requirement should only be cache alignment, not power of 2
> alignment. This isn't meant to be a slab allocator. We are just
> sectioning up pages to handle mixed workloads. In the case of
> networking we can end up getting everything from 60B packets, to 1514B
> in the standard cases. That was why we started sectioning up pages in
> the first place so putting a power of 2 requirement on it doens't fit
> our use case at all and is what we were trying to get away from with
> the SLAB allocators.
It seems that is_power_of_2() checking in this patch does not excluding
the non-align case if we are passing 'align' being 1, which means we still
can support the 'everything from 60B packets, to 1514B' case.
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists