[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231130-laborious-dwarf-6913457466ad@spud>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:10:03 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: timer: thead,c900-aclint-mtimer:
separate mtime and mtimecmp regs
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 05:18:15PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:15 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > and add separate "riscv" prefixed DT binding for RISC-V mtimer.
> >
> > Do you know of any users for a "riscv,mtimer" binding that are not
> > covered by existing bindings for the clint?
>
> Ventana Veyron-v1 implements a mtimer per-cluster (or chiplet)
> which is compatible to "riscv,mtimer" (i.e. we have both mtime
> and mtimecmp MMIO registers).
Okay, thanks. I guess iff veyron-v1 DT support shows up (or other
similar devices) we can go ahead with a "riscv,mtimer" binding then.
I had thought that you guys were going to be using ACPI though, so
I guess the "other similar devices" applies.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists