[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <893192db-0431-4d1f-7281-952da9979345@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 19:20:50 +0530
From: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>
Cc: helen.koike@...labora.com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
daniels@...labora.com, emma@...olt.net,
gustavo.padovan@...labora.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
guilherme.gallo@...labora.com, sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
david.heidelberg@...labora.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] drm: ci: mediatek: Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER for
mt8173
Hi Daniel,
On 29/11/23 18:52, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com> wrote:
>> Expected driver for mt8173 is "mediatek" and for mt8183
>> it is "panfrost". Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER to 'mediatek' as
>> the expected driver for mt8173.
>
> Actually, for mt8183 it's both. And for mt8173 it will probably be
> mediatek+pvr pretty soon. Each of these SoCs (like most Arm devices)
> have a separate display controller and GPU, with different drivers for
> each. They'll run different tests with different xfails. So we should
> figure out a way to support igt running for both devices on the one
> system.
Agree. Will work on separate patch to test both the drivers for these
devices.
Regards,
Vignesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists