linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Don't create devices for disabled features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:38:29 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, markgross@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Don't create devices for
 disabled features

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:33:00PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-11-30 at 14:26 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

...

> > > > +       if (!feature_state.enabled)
> > > > +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > 
> > > -ENODEV sounds more appropriate.  
> >
> > The -EOPNOTSUPP is returned matching the next return statement, which
> > causes to continue to create devices which are supported and not
> > disabled. Any other error is real device creation will causes driver
> > modprobe to fail.
> 
> Oh, I see... I didn't look that deep into the code during my review
> (perhaps note that down into the commit message?).

Maybe we should even use -ENOTSUPP (Linux internal error code), so
it will be clear that it's _not_ going to user space?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko