[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWoLzTX0zmCOxsVm@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:37:33 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 04:27:33PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > A Fixes tag does not in itself imply that something should be
> > backported, we have CC-stable tags for that.
>
> IDK, I think at this point every highly active kernel developer should
> be aware that the stable maintainers backport way more than just what
> gets explicitly CCed to stable.
I'm quite aware of that, and if one of my patches with a Fixes tag is
picked up for backporting when it should not I complain loudly.
For this patch, I would not necessarily complain however as the current
example is misleading.
Johan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists