[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWoOaRLZGXMhwC_r@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 17:48:41 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix
example regulator node
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 03:42:38PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/12/2023 15:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:25:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> The example regulator child nodes do not have unit addresses so drop the
> >> incorrect '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties from the parent
> >> node.
> >> regulators {
> >> - #address-cells = <1>;
> >> - #size-cells = <0>;
> >> -
> >
> > It's the right fix, but I have to wonder why these are not schema
> > errors? Seems like something in the schemas needs fixing.
>
> Good point. The fix is just not sufficient. This binding explicitly
> allow it, so it should be removed there as well.
Ah, I missed that. Now fixed up in v2.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists