[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231201172716.182693-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 18:27:14 +0100
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
To: stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, greg@...ah.com,
jtornosm@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oneukum@...e.com, pabeni@...hat.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: avoid failed operations when device is disconnected
Hi Alan,
> Would it be good enough just to check for ret != -ENODEV and not do the
> stopping_unbinding check at all?
I thought about that but if possible, I would like to ignore the failed
operation messages only under a controlled and expected situation.
I think that if there is a problem with the device it will be easier to
analyze it later with all the possible information.
But this is my opinion ...
Thank you
Best regards
José Ignacio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists