linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Pin control fixes for v6.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYcPBSp-XGXr=3a+AGOVVVHQoaciSgAUuJS+=3ScGWcSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:12:23 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     "Aiqun(Maria) Yu" <quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Pin control fixes for v6.7

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:10 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> Hi Nathan, Nick,
>
> (just picking some LLVM compiler people I know of... and trust)

Forget that part of the mail, written out-of-context when I was
running different
disassembly of GCC vs LLVM code. I figured it out and concluded that
the compilers
are fine and doing the right thing, it's a none-issue in that regard.

Yours,
Linus Walleij