linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add TP6594 family PMICs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:31:50 +0100
From:   Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:     vigneshr@...com, kristo@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, u-kumar1@...com,
        Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>,
        Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add TP6594 family PMICs

On 12/1/23 06:14, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:28-20231027, Thomas Richard wrote:
>> From: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for TPS6594 PMIC family on wakup I2C0 bus.
>> Theses devices provides regulators (bucks and LDOs), but also
>> GPIOs, a RTC, a watchdog, an ESM (Error Signal Monitor)
>> which monitors the SoC error output signal, and a PFSM
>> (Pre-configurable Finite State Machine) which manages the
>> operational modes of the PMIC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Esteban Blanc <eblanc@...libre.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>>     This patch was picked from:
>>     https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230810-tps6594-v6-0-2b2e2399e2ef@ti.com/
>>     
>>     I reviewed it, and checked that there is no issue during the boot.
> 
> Thank you, but I am considering a more comprehensive series from Neha[1]
> instead, if you don't mind.

It's ok for me.
Neha told me he sent a new version of the series.
I sent only this patch, as I was able to test only j7200.

Regards,

Thomas