linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 06/32] timers: Do not IPI for deferrable timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231201092654.34614-7-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri,  1 Dec 2023 10:26:28 +0100
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/32] timers: Do not IPI for deferrable timers

Deferrable timers do not prevent CPU from going idle and are not taken into
account on idle path. Sending an IPI to a remote CPU when a new first
deferrable timer was enqueued will wake up the remote CPU but nothing will
be done regarding the deferrable timers.

Drop IPI completely when a new first deferrable timer was enqueued.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
v9: Only a typo fix

v8: Update comment

v6: new patch
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 46a9b96a3976..a6e31b09637c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -571,18 +571,15 @@ static int calc_wheel_index(unsigned long expires, unsigned long clk,
 static void
 trigger_dyntick_cpu(struct timer_base *base, struct timer_list *timer)
 {
-	if (!is_timers_nohz_active())
-		return;
-
 	/*
-	 * TODO: This wants some optimizing similar to the code below, but we
-	 * will do that when we switch from push to pull for deferrable timers.
+	 * Deferrable timers do not prevent the CPU from entering dynticks and
+	 * are not taken into account on the idle/nohz_full path. An IPI when a
+	 * new deferrable timer is enqueued will wake up the remote CPU but
+	 * nothing will be done with the deferrable timer base. Therefore skip
+	 * the remote IPI for deferrable timers completely.
 	 */
-	if (timer->flags & TIMER_DEFERRABLE) {
-		if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(base->cpu))
-			wake_up_nohz_cpu(base->cpu);
+	if (!is_timers_nohz_active() || timer->flags & TIMER_DEFERRABLE)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We might have to IPI the remote CPU if the base is idle and the
-- 
2.39.2