linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 24/32] timers: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231201092654.34614-25-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri,  1 Dec 2023 10:26:46 +0100
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v9 24/32] timers: Split out "get next timer interrupt" functionality

The functionality for getting the next timer interrupt in
get_next_timer_interrupt() is split into a separate function
fetch_next_timer_interrupt() to be usable by other call sites.

This is preparatory work for the conversion of the NOHZ timer
placement to a pull at expiry time model. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
v9: Update was required (change of preceding patches)
v6: s/splitted/split
v5: Update commit message
v4: Fix typo in comment
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 0d53d853ae22..fc376e06980e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1985,30 +1985,13 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base,
 	return base->next_expiry;
 }
 
-static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
-					     bool *idle)
+static unsigned long fetch_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+						struct timer_base *base_local,
+						struct timer_base *base_global,
+						struct timer_events *tevt)
 {
-	struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
 	unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
-	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
 	bool local_first;
-	u64 expires;
-
-	/*
-	 * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
-	 * Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu.
-	 */
-	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
-		if (idle)
-			*idle = true;
-		return tevt.local;
-	}
-
-	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
-	base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
-
-	raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
-	raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 
 	nextevt_local = next_timer_interrupt(base_local, basej);
 	nextevt_global = next_timer_interrupt(base_global, basej);
@@ -2037,8 +2020,8 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 		/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
 		if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
 			nextevt = basej;
-		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
-		goto unlock;
+		tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		return nextevt;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2048,10 +2031,40 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 	 * ignored. If the global queue is empty, nothing to do either.
 	 */
 	if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
-		tevt.global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		tevt->global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
 
 	if (base_local->timers_pending)
-		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		tevt->local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+	return nextevt;
+}
+
+static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
+					     bool *idle)
+{
+	struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
+	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
+	unsigned long nextevt;
+	u64 expires;
+
+	/*
+	 * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
+	 * Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
+		if (idle)
+			*idle = true;
+		return tevt.local;
+	}
+
+	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
+	base_global = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL]);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&base_local->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_nested(&base_global->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
+	nextevt = fetch_next_timer_interrupt(basej, basem, base_local,
+					     base_global, &tevt);
 
 	/*
 	 * We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
@@ -2082,7 +2095,6 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 		trace_timer_base_idle(base_local->is_idle, base_local->cpu);
 	}
 
-unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
 
-- 
2.39.2