linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 23/32] timers: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231201092654.34614-24-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri,  1 Dec 2023 10:26:45 +0100
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 23/32] timers: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers separately

For the conversion of the NOHZ timer placement to a pull at expiry time
model it's required to have separate expiry times for the pinned and the
non-pinned (movable) timers. Therefore struct timer_events is introduced.

No functional change

Originally-by: Richard Cochran (linutronix GmbH) <richardcochran@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
v9: Update was required (change of preceding patches)
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 366ea26ce3ba..0d53d853ae22 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -221,6 +221,11 @@ struct timer_base {
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct timer_base, timer_bases[NR_BASES]);
 
+struct timer_events {
+	u64	local;
+	u64	global;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(timers_nohz_active);
@@ -1983,10 +1988,11 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base,
 static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 					     bool *idle)
 {
+	struct timer_events tevt = { .local = KTIME_MAX, .global = KTIME_MAX };
 	unsigned long nextevt, nextevt_local, nextevt_global;
 	struct timer_base *base_local, *base_global;
-	u64 expires = KTIME_MAX;
 	bool local_first;
+	u64 expires;
 
 	/*
 	 * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline.
@@ -1995,7 +2001,7 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
 		if (idle)
 			*idle = true;
-		return expires;
+		return tevt.local;
 	}
 
 	base_local = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
@@ -2022,13 +2028,31 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 
 	nextevt = local_first ? nextevt_local : nextevt_global;
 
-	if (base_local->timers_pending || base_global->timers_pending) {
+	/*
+	 * If the @nextevt is at max. one tick away, use @nextevt and store
+	 * it in the local expiry value. The next global event is irrelevant in
+	 * this case and can be left as KTIME_MAX.
+	 */
+	if (time_before_eq(nextevt, basej + 1)) {
 		/* If we missed a tick already, force 0 delta */
 		if (time_before(nextevt, basej))
 			nextevt = basej;
-		expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Update tevt.* values:
+	 *
+	 * If the local queue expires first, then the global event can be
+	 * ignored. If the global queue is empty, nothing to do either.
+	 */
+	if (!local_first && base_global->timers_pending)
+		tevt.global = basem + (u64)(nextevt_global - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
+	if (base_local->timers_pending)
+		tevt.local = basem + (u64)(nextevt_local - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+
 	/*
 	 * We have a fresh next event. Check whether we can forward the
 	 * base.
@@ -2058,9 +2082,12 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem,
 		trace_timer_base_idle(base_local->is_idle, base_local->cpu);
 	}
 
+unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_global->lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock(&base_local->lock);
 
+	expires = min_t(u64, tevt.local, tevt.global);
+
 	return cmp_next_hrtimer_event(basem, expires);
 }
 
-- 
2.39.2