[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWmpQzkxFvAMURJ7@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:37:07 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: fix example node names
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/11/2023 18:25, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Devicetree node names should be generic; fix up the pm8008 binding
> > example accordingly.
> >
> > Fixes: b0572a9b2397 ("dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Add bindings")
>
> No, there is no bug here. The generic node names rule is just a style
> issue, not a bug. We have never marked these as bugs even in DTS where
> they matter. Here, it is an example, so it would not matter anyway.
Here I agree with you, this is just a cleanup.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists