linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: pagewalk: assert write mmap lock only for walking the user page tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e5c199a-9b4d-4d1b-97d4-dd2b776ac85f@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 19:09:29 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: pagewalk: assert write mmap lock only for walking
 the user page tables



On 2023/11/27 16:46, Muchun Song wrote:
> The 8782fb61cc848 ("mm: pagewalk: Fix race between unmap and page walker")
> introduces an assertion to walk_page_range_novma() to make all the users
> of page table walker is safe. However, the race only exists for walking the
> user page tables. And it is ridiculous to hold a particular user mmap write
> lock against the changes of the kernel page tables. So only assert at least
> mmap read lock when walking the kernel page tables. And some users matching
> this case could downgrade to a mmap read lock to relief the contention of
> mmap lock of init_mm, it will be nicer in hugetlb (only holding mmap read
> lock) in the next patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> ---
>   mm/pagewalk.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
> index b7d7e4fcfad7a..f46c80b18ce4f 100644
> --- a/mm/pagewalk.c
> +++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
> @@ -539,6 +539,11 @@ int walk_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>    * not backed by VMAs. Because 'unusual' entries may be walked this function
>    * will also not lock the PTEs for the pte_entry() callback. This is useful for
>    * walking the kernel pages tables or page tables for firmware.
> + *
> + * Note: Be careful to walk the kernel pages tables, the caller may be need to
> + * take other effective approache (mmap lock may be insufficient) to prevent
> + * the intermediate kernel page tables belonging to the specified address range
> + * from being freed (e.g. memory hot-remove).
>    */
>   int walk_page_range_novma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>   			  unsigned long end, const struct mm_walk_ops *ops,
> @@ -556,7 +561,29 @@ int walk_page_range_novma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>   	if (start >= end || !walk.mm)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	mmap_assert_write_locked(walk.mm);
> +	/*
> +	 * 1) For walking the user virtual address space:
> +	 *
> +	 * The mmap lock protects the page walker from changes to the page
> +	 * tables during the walk.  However a read lock is insufficient to
> +	 * protect those areas which don't have a VMA as munmap() detaches
> +	 * the VMAs before downgrading to a read lock and actually tearing
> +	 * down PTEs/page tables. In which case, the mmap write lock should
> +	 * be hold.
> +	 *
> +	 * 2) For walking the kernel virtual address space:
> +	 *
> +	 * The kernel intermediate page tables usually do not be freed, so
> +	 * the mmap map read lock is sufficient. But there are some exceptions.
> +	 * E.g. memory hot-remove. In which case, the mmap lock is insufficient
> +	 * to prevent the intermediate kernel pages tables belonging to the
> +	 * specified address range from being freed. The caller should take
> +	 * other actions to prevent this race.
> +	 */
> +	if (mm == &init_mm)
> +		mmap_assert_locked(walk.mm);
> +	else
> +		mmap_assert_write_locked(walk.mm);

Maybe just use process_mm_walk_lock() and set correct page_walk_lock in 
struct mm_walk_ops?

>   
>   	return walk_pgd_range(start, end, &walk);
>   }