[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231201144320.GA977713-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 08:43:20 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-mpp: clean up example
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:28:34PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The Multi-Purpose Pin controller block is part of an SPMI PMIC (which in
> turns sits on an SPMI bus) and uses a single value for the register
> property that corresponds to its base address.
>
> Clean up the example by adding a parent PMIC node with proper
> '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' properties, dropping the incorrect
> second register value, adding some newline separators and increasing the
> indentation to four spaces.
This is fine, but I prefer these MFDs have 1 complete example rather
than piecemeal examples for each child device.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists