[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad92f9cb-3d66-0ad8-aac3-b753bcadf7df@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 15:41:41 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: xni@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] md: don't leave 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN' in error path
of md_set_readonly()
Hi,
在 2023/12/02 4:53, Song Liu 写道:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 8:32 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> If md_set_readonly() failed, the array could still be read-write, however
>> 'MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN' could still be set, which leave the array in an
>> abnormal state that sync or recovery can't continue anymore.
>> Hence make sure the flag is cleared after md_set_readonly() returns.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>> Acked-by: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
>
> Since we are shipping this via the md-fixes branch, we need a Fixes tag.
Okay, I'll add following fix tag:
Fixes: 88724bfa68be ("md: wait for pending superblock updates before
switching to read-only")
>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/md.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
>> index 5640a948086b..2d8e45a1af23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
>> @@ -6355,6 +6355,9 @@ static int md_set_readonly(struct mddev *mddev, struct block_device *bdev)
>> int err = 0;
>> int did_freeze = 0;
>>
>> + if (mddev->external && test_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags))
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery)) {
>> did_freeze = 1;
>> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>> @@ -6369,8 +6372,6 @@ static int md_set_readonly(struct mddev *mddev, struct block_device *bdev)
>> */
>> md_wakeup_thread_directly(mddev->sync_thread);
>>
>> - if (mddev->external && test_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags))
>> - return -EBUSY;
>> mddev_unlock(mddev);
>> wait_event(resync_wait, !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING,
>> &mddev->recovery));
>> @@ -6383,29 +6384,30 @@ static int md_set_readonly(struct mddev *mddev, struct block_device *bdev)
>> mddev->sync_thread ||
>> test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery)) {
>> pr_warn("md: %s still in use.\n",mdname(mddev));
>> - if (did_freeze) {
>> - clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>> - set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
>> - md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> - }
>
> This change (move did_freeze, etc.) is not explained in the commit log.
> Is it just refactor?
It is refactor, but it is also part of "make sure the flag is cleared
after md_set_readonly() returns", because now that MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN
will be cleared:
if ((mddev->pers && !err) || did_freeze)
Which means,
- If set readonly succeed, or;
- if something is wrong and did_freeze is set, exactly what this patch
tries to do;
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
>
>> err = -EBUSY;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> +
>> if (mddev->pers) {
>> __md_stop_writes(mddev);
>>
>> - err = -ENXIO;
>> - if (mddev->ro == MD_RDONLY)
>> + if (mddev->ro == MD_RDONLY) {
>> + err = -ENXIO;
>> goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> mddev->ro = MD_RDONLY;
>> set_disk_ro(mddev->gendisk, 1);
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if ((mddev->pers && !err) || did_freeze) {
>> clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
>> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
>> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_state);
>> - err = 0;
>> }
>> -out:
>> +
>> mutex_unlock(&mddev->open_mutex);
>> return err;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists