[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb3d3b12-abf3-4eda-8d9a-944684d05505@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 08:04:10 +0000
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
aarcange@...hat.com, lokeshgidra@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
jannh@...gle.com, zhangpeng362@...wei.com, bgeffon@...gle.com,
kaleshsingh@...gle.com, ngeoffray@...gle.com, jdduke@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test
On 01/12/2023 20:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 01.12.23 10:29, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 21/11/2023 17:16, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>>> Add tests for new UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl which uses uffd to move source
>>> into destination buffer while checking the contents of both after
>>> the move. After the operation the content of the destination buffer
>>> should match the original source buffer's content while the source
>>> buffer should be zeroed. Separate tests are designed for PMD aligned and
>>> unaligned cases because they utilize different code paths in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 24 +++
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h | 1 +
>>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 214 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
>>> index fb3bbc77fd00..b0ac0ec2356d 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c
>>> @@ -631,6 +631,30 @@ int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool wp)
>>> return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false, wp);
>>> }
>>> +int move_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, unsigned long len)
>>> +{
>>> + struct uffdio_move uffdio_move;
>>> +
>>> + if (offset + len > nr_pages * page_size)
>>> + err("unexpected offset %lu and length %lu\n", offset, len);
>>> + uffdio_move.dst = (unsigned long) area_dst + offset;
>>> + uffdio_move.src = (unsigned long) area_src + offset;
>>> + uffdio_move.len = len;
>>> + uffdio_move.mode = UFFDIO_MOVE_MODE_ALLOW_SRC_HOLES;
>>> + uffdio_move.move = 0;
>>> + if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_MOVE, &uffdio_move)) {
>>> + /* real retval in uffdio_move.move */
>>> + if (uffdio_move.move != -EEXIST)
>>> + err("UFFDIO_MOVE error: %"PRId64,
>>> + (int64_t)uffdio_move.move);
>>
>> Hi Suren,
>>
>> FYI this error is triggering in mm-unstable (715b67adf4c8):
>>
>> Testing move-pmd on anon... ERROR: UFFDIO_MOVE error: -16 (errno=16,
>> @uffd-common.c:648)
>>
>> I'm running in a VM on Apple M2 (arm64). I haven't debugged any further, but
>> happy to go deeper if you can direct.
>
> Does it trigger reliably? Which pagesize is that kernel using?
Yep, although very occasionally it fails with EAGAIN. 4K kernel; see other email
for full config.
>
> I can spot that uffd_move_pmd_test()/uffd_move_pmd_handle_fault() uses
> default_huge_page_size(), which reads the default hugetlb size.
My kernel command line is explicitly seting the default huge page size to 2M.
>
> That, however, does not necessarily correspond to the THP size. That one can be
> obtained using read_pmd_pagesize() in vm_util.c
>
> I quickly scanned the code (still want to take a deeper look), but all PAE
> checks looked sane to me.
>
> I think the issue is folio split handling. I replied to the patch.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists