[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231202171612.GC50400@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 17:16:12 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri05@...il.com>,
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...sta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] net/tcp: Store SNEs + SEQs on ao_info
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 04:57:20PM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> RFC 5925 (6.2):
> > TCP-AO emulates a 64-bit sequence number space by inferring when to
> > increment the high-order 32-bit portion (the SNE) based on
> > transitions in the low-order portion (the TCP sequence number).
>
> snd_sne and rcv_sne are the upper 4 bytes of extended SEQ number.
> Unfortunately, reading two 4-bytes pointers can't be performed
> atomically (without synchronization).
>
> In order to avoid locks on TCP fastpath, let's just double-account for
> SEQ changes: snd_una/rcv_nxt will be lower 4 bytes of snd_sne/rcv_sne.
>
> Fixes: 64382c71a557 ("net/tcp: Add TCP-AO SNE support")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
...
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp_ao.h b/include/net/tcp_ao.h
> index 647781080613..b8ef25d4b632 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp_ao.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp_ao.h
> @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ struct tcp_ao_info {
> * - for time-wait sockets the basis is tw_rcv_nxt/tw_snd_nxt.
> * tw_snd_nxt is not expected to change, while tw_rcv_nxt may.
> */
> - u32 snd_sne;
> - u32 rcv_sne;
> + u64 snd_sne;
> + u64 rcv_sne;
> refcount_t refcnt; /* Protects twsk destruction */
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
Hi Dmitry,
In tcp_ao.c:tcp_ao_connect_init() there is a local
variable:
struct tcp_ao_info *ao_info;
And the following assignment occurs:
ao_info->snd_sne = htonl(tp->write_seq);
Is this still correct in light of the change of the type of snd_sne?
Flagged by Sparse.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists