[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67b155dd-3731-489e-c3bd-333cb7e90801@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 19:12:25 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: "Song, Xiongwei" <Xiongwei.Song@...driver.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"sxwjean@...com" <sxwjean@...com>
Cc: "42.hyeyoo@...il.com" <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"roman.gushchin@...ux.dev" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: unify all sl[au]b parameters with
"slab_$param"
On 12/2/23 05:23, Song, Xiongwei wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 1:48 AM
>> To: sxwjean@...com
>> Cc: vbabka@...e.cz; 42.hyeyoo@...il.com; cl@...ux.com; linux-mm@...ck.org;
>> penberg@...nel.org; rientjes@...gle.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@....com;
>> roman.gushchin@...ux.dev; corbet@....net; arnd@...db.de; akpm@...ux-
>> foundation.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Song, Xiongwei <Xiongwei.Song@...driver.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: unify all sl[au]b parameters with "slab_$param"
>>
>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>> content is safe.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:15:04AM +0800, sxwjean@...com wrote:
>> > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
>> >
>> > Since the SLAB allocator has been removed, so we need to clean up the
>> > sl[au]b_$params. However, the "slab/SLAB" terms should be keep for
>> > long-term rather than "slub/SLUB". Hence, we should use "slab_$param"
>> > as the primary prefix, which is pointed out by Vlastimil Babka. For more
>> > information please see [1].
>> >
>> > This patch is changing the following slab parameters
>> > - slub_max_order
>> > - slub_min_order
>> > - slub_min_objects
>> > - slub_debug
>> > to
>> > - slab_max_order
>> > - slab_min_order
>> > - slab_min_objects
>> > - slab_debug
>> > as the primary slab parameters in
>> > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt and source, and rename all
>> > setup functions of them too. Meanwhile, "slub_$params" can also be passed
>> > by command line, which is to keep backward compatibility. Also mark all
>> > "slub_$params" as legacy.
>>
>> *If* we do this, I think the old names need to be recognized, perhaps
Yes, they are already recognized by the patch.
>> with a boot pr_warn() about their deprecation/renaming for several
>> releases (likely across LTSes). I think it's not a good idea to
>> wholesale rename these with no warning. That's going to cause a lot of
>> surprises and broken userspace...
>
> Oh, yes, that's a good idea. Will update.
I'd wait for a while with the warnings, no need to rush.
> Regards,
> Xiongwei
>>
>> --
>> Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists