[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231202184507.26178c17@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 18:45:07 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [RCU] rcu_tasks_trace_qs(): trc_reader_special.b.need_qs value
incorrect likely()?
On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 14:24:26 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Note, the unlikely tracing is running on my production server v6.6.3.
> >
> > The above trace is from my test box with latest Linus's tree.
>
> Nice tool!!!
Thanks! It's only been in the kernel since 2008 ;-)
1f0d69a9fc815 ("tracing: profile likely and unlikely annotations")
>
> My kneejerk reaction is that that condition is suboptimal. Does the
> (untested) patch below help things?
I'll give it a try on Monday.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists