linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86/percpu: Fix "const_pcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 07:19:26 +0900
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86/percpu: Fix "const_pcpu_hot" version
 generation failure

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 07:12, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * The generic per-cpu infrastrucutre is not suitable for
> + * reading const-qualified variables.
> + */
> +#define this_cpu_read_const(pcp)       ({ BUG(); (typeof(pcp))0; })

NAK. Absolutely not.

No way in hell is it acceptable to make this a run-time BUG. If it
doesn't work, it needs to be a compile failure. End of story.

                Linus