lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20231203001501.126339-4-sxwjean@me.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 08:15:01 +0800 From: sxwjean@...com To: vbabka@...e.cz, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, cl@...ux.com, linux-mm@...ck.org Cc: penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, corbet@....net, keescook@...omium.org, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: correct the default value of slub_min_objects in doc From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com> There is no a value assigned to slub_min_objects by default, it always is 0 that is initialized by compiler if no assigned value by command line. min_objects is calculated based on processor numbers in calculate_order(). For more details, see commit 9b2cd506e5f2 ("slub: Calculate min_objects based on number of processors.") Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com> --- Documentation/mm/slub.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst index be75971532f5..1f4399581449 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/slub.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/slub.rst @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ list_lock once in a while to deal with partial slabs. That overhead is governed by the order of the allocation for each slab. The allocations can be influenced by kernel parameters: -.. slub_min_objects=x (default 4) +.. slub_min_objects=x (default 0) .. slub_min_order=x (default 0) .. slub_max_order=x (default 3 (PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) -- 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists