linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] usb: hub: Add quirk to decrease IN-ep poll interval for Microchip USB491x hub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:44:57 -0500
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Hardik Gajjar <hgajjar@...adit-jv.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, corbet@....net,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        erosca@...adit-jv.com, tj@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
        Martin.Mueller5@...bosch.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: hub: Add quirk to decrease IN-ep poll interval
 for Microchip USB491x hub

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:25:43PM +0100, Hardik Gajjar wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:02:50AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > And why not use BIT() as that's what these are.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> I am considering aligning with existing quirks.
> Is it advisable to use something like HUB_QUIRK_REDUCE_FRAME_INTR_BINTERVAL BIT(2)? 
> I'm thinking to submit two patches – one to replace hard values with BIT() in existing quirks and a second patch containing my changes.

That's a good idea.

Alan Stern